Evaluation of Typing Key Layouts for Stylus Input
- 1 September 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Vol. 43 (5) , 420-424
- https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129904300506
Abstract
We studied initial user performance with and preference for alternative typing-key layouts for typing with a stylus. Previous analyses have indicated that, after asymptotic practice with this kind of typing, users should type fastest with certain nonstandard layouts. Although asymptotic performance is important in selecting a layout, it also is important to evaluate initial performance with and preference for layouts. Twelve participants used paper models of six different layouts to type four sentences. The layouts were the QWERTY, Dvorak, standard alphabetic, square alphabetic, and two digraph-based layouts. Performance and preference favored the QWERTY over the other layouts. The square alphabetic layout took a distant second place. QWERTY should be a product's default layout even if users can type with only a single finger or a stylus. If the QWERTY layout is not feasible, designers should consider using the square alphabetic layout for limited typing or a digraph-based layout for extensive typing.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a Digram-Based Typing Key Layout for Single-Finger/Stylus InputProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1999
- Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speed using a stylus and a soft keyboardBehaviour & Information Technology, 1995
- Pairs of Latin squares that produce digram-balanced Greco-Latin designs: A BASIC programBehavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 1993
- Pairs of Latin Squares to Counterbalance Sequential Effects and Pairing of Conditions and StimuliProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1989
- Alphabetic Entry Procedure with Small Keypads: Key Layout does MatterProceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 1983