How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ?
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Genetics
- Vol. 25 (5) , 210-216
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- RNA-based gene duplication: mechanistic and evolutionary insightsNature Reviews Genetics, 2009
- Rapidly evolving fish genomes and teleost diversityCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development, 2008
- Preferential subfunctionalization of slow-evolving genes after allopolyploidization inXenopus laevisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- The evolutionary dynamics of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein interaction network after duplicationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elementsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogenyNature, 2007
- Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungiNature, 2007
- Emerging principles of regulatory evolutionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Duplicate genes increase gene expression diversity within and between speciesNature Genetics, 2004