The tibia and tarsus in Herrerasauridae (Dinosauria, incertae sedis) and the origin and evolution of the dinosaurian tarsus
- 1 September 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Paleontology
- Vol. 63 (5) , 677-690
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022336000041317
Abstract
The tarsus and distal end of the tibia are described in Herrerasauridae, a family that includes the oldest known dinosaurs. This tarsal configuration is compared to those of more advanced dinosaurs and to other archosaurs. Through phylogenetic analysis of the morphological characters, a picture emerges of the evolutionary changes in the ankles of early dinosaurs.The tibia of the herrerasaurids has a quadrangular distal articular surface, with a shallow ventrolateral notch. This morphology is strikingly similar to that of the lagosuchid thecodonts Pseudolagosuchus and Lagosuchus and represents the most primitive tibial condition known for Dinosauria.Aside from the derived states possessed by Theropoda, Sauropodomorpha, and Ornithischia, respectively, it was impossible to recognize synapomorphies in tibiotarsal anatomy shared by these groups exclusive of Herrerasauridae. The transverse broadening of the distal end of the tibia seems to have been attained independently by ornithischians, theropods, and sauropodomorphs.The tarsus of herrerasaurids is characterized by an astragalus with a small but conspicuous lateroventral depression, by a pyramidal calcaneum with a ventromedial projection that articulates into the cavity of the astragalus just mentioned, and by a posterolaterally directed calcaneal tuber. These characters are also seen in Lagosuchus (a close relative of dinosaurs), in the prosauropod Riojasaurus and, insofar as the astragalus is concerned, in the primitive dinosaur Walkeria, which suggests that dinosaurs of different lineages shared the same tarsal condition.By definition, this type of articulation between the astragalus and calcaneum follows the “crocodile-reversed” tarsal condition, suggesting that the tarsus in lagosuchids and dinosaurs could be derived from the “crocodile-reversed” pattern present in Ornithosuchidae and Euparkeria. In contrast, the mesotarsal ankle of lagosuchids and dinosaurs lacks the synapomorphies of the “crocodile-normal” ankle present in Crocodylia, Rauisuchidae, Aetosauria, and other archosaurs.It is concluded that Herrerasauridae retained the primitive tibiotarsal condition for Dinosauria, from which those of the Ornithischia, Sauropodomorpha, and Theropoda were derived. Furthermore, tibiotarsal anatomy supports monophyly of Dinosauria.This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Joints of the crocodile-reversed archosaursNature, 1988
- Joints of the crocodile-reversed archosaursNature, 1988
- Archosaur ankles and the relationships of the thecodontian and dinosaurian reptilesNature, 1985
- Postosuchus, a new Thecodontian reptile from the Triassic of Texas and the origin of TyrannosaursPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1985
- Classification of the thecodontiaGeobios, 1982
- Phylogeny and classification of thecodontian reptilesNature, 1982
- Dinosaur polyphyly and the classification of Archosaurs and birdsAustralian Journal of Zoology, 1975
- Dinosaur Monophyly and a New Class of VertebratesNature, 1974
- Comments on early saurischiansZoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1969
- The anatomy of the thecodont reptile Euparkeria capensis BroomPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1965