The Structure of Temperament among Japanese and American Young Adults
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in International Journal of Behavioral Development
- Vol. 8 (2) , 217-237
- https://doi.org/10.1177/016502548500800207
Abstract
To assess the generalizability of the structure of temperament, identified among American young adult samples, to similarly-aged groups in another culture, 304 Japanese college students (59.5% males) were studied. The Japanese responses to the Dimensions of Temperament Survey (DOTS) were compared to those of the American sample studied by Lerner, Palermo, Spiro and Nesselroade (1982) through the use of confirmatory factor analytic procedures. The major results were that evidence for: (1) the five factors present on the DOTS in the American sample (i.e., the factors of Activity, Attention Span/Distractibility, Adaptability/Approach-Withdrawal, Rhythmicity, and Reactivity) were identified also among the Japanese; but that (2) large cultural differences in the Adaptability/Approach-Withdrawal dimension existed. Results are discussed in regard to methodological issues in establishing cross-cultural measurement equivalence and in regard to future research on adult temperament.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- TEMPERAMENT AND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN'S ACTUAL AND RATED ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A TEST OF A‘GOODNESS‐OF‐FIT’ MODELJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1985
- The Role of Temperament in Psychosocial Adaptation in Early Adolescents: A Test of a “Goodness of Fit” ModelThe Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1983
- Sex differences in the structure of intelligence: A confirmatory factor analysisIntelligence, 1982
- Self-Concept, Self-Esteem, and Body Attitudes among Japanese Male and Female AdolescentsChild Development, 1980
- Cross-cultural perspectives on early development.American Psychologist, 1973
- Methodological Issues of Cross-Cultural Research in Developmental PsychologyPublished by Elsevier ,1973
- Simultaneous factor analysis in several populationsPsychometrika, 1971
- Comments on “Cross-Cultural Equivalence of Personality Measures”The Journal of Social Psychology, 1968
- A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.Psychological Review, 1968
- The Factorial Interpretation of Test DifficultyPsychometrika, 1941