Effect of periodic letters on evidence-based drug therapy on prescribing behaviour: a randomized trial
Open Access
- 26 October 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 171 (9) , 1057-1061
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1031621
Abstract
Background: The effect of regular and expected printed educational materials on physician prescribing behaviour has not been studied. We sought to measure the impact of a series of evidence-based drug therapy letters mailed to physicians in British Columbia on prescribing to newly treated patients. Methods: A paired, cluster randomized community design was used. The study population included 499 physicians from 24 local health areas in British Columbia. Local health areas were paired by number of physicians, and 1 of each pair was randomly selected and its physicians assigned to an intervention group or a control group. The intervention was 12 issues of an evidence-based series called Therapeutics Letter. Physicians in the control group (n = 241) received the letters 3–8 months after physicians in the intervention group (n = 258). The impact on prescribing to newly treated patients (defined as patients who had not previously made a claim for any medication from the class of drugs profiled in the letter) was analyzed using the drug claims database of BC Pharmacare, a publicly funded drug benefits program that covered all seniors and people receiving social assistance. Results: The probability of prescribing a drug recommended in the Therapeutics Letter rather than another drug in the same class increased by 30% in the 3 months after the mailing of the letter relative to the preceding 3 months, adjusted for any before–after changes in the control group (relative risk 1.30; 95% confidence interval 1.13–1.52). No letter achieved statistical significance on its own. However, 11 of the 12 letters produced prescribing changes in the predicted direction such that the overall result was significant when their effect was combined. Interpretation: The combined effect of an ongoing series of printed letters distributed from a credible and trusted source can have a clinically significant effect on prescribing to newly treated patients.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Prevalence of COPDChest, 2000
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Very Young and Very Old PatientsChest, 2000
- Trends in the Epidemiology of COPD in Canada, 1980 to 1995Chest, 1999
- Influences of educational interventions and adverse news about calcium-channel blockers on first-line prescribing of antihypertensive drugs to elderly people in British ColumbiaThe Lancet, 1998
- Strategies for improving prescribing practice.1996
- No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.1995
- Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials.1992
- Impact of a Drug-Use Review Program Intervention on Prescribing after Publication of a Randomized Clinical TrialAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 1990
- Improving Drug Prescribing in Primary Care: A Critical Analysis of the Experimental LiteratureThe Milbank Quarterly, 1989
- Improving Drug-Therapy Decisions through Educational OutreachNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983