Liberal Democracy: One Form or Many?
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Political Studies
- Vol. 40 (1_suppl) , 130-145
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01817.x
Abstract
This article examines whether there are significant differences between liberal democracies which warrant them being classified as different forms of democracy. The article begins by outlining six features of liberal democracy which are crucial in understanding how this type of government works. The subsequent section examines the origins of liberal democracy and considers the relevance of arguments derived from American ‘exceptionalism’. Attention is then focused on liberal democratic governments today – by reference to Lijphart's distinction between ‘majoritarian’ and ‘consensus' democracies. Finally, the article looks at whether the form of liberal democracy is changed substantially when it is transplanted into a cultural context different from the one in which it originated. The general conclusion is that there is no case for identifying different forms of liberal democracy.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patronage and Federalism - Seymour Martin Lipset: Continental Divide: Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada, London, Routledge, 1990, xviii + 337 pp., £35.00.Government and Opposition, 1991
- Union Organization in Advanced Industrial DemocraciesAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- Comparative Political SystemsThe Journal of Politics, 1956