Judging research quality and journals: A call for debate
- 1 October 1996
- Vol. 24 (5) , 613
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0483(96)90031-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accountingOmega, 1996
- Citation as effortful voting: A reply to ones, Brinn and PendleburyOmega, 1996
- Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced responseOmega, 1996
- An empirical assessment of influences on POM researchOmega, 1996
- The judge, the model of the judge, and the model of the judged as judge: Analyses of the UK 1992 research assessment exercise data for business and management studiesOmega, 1996
- Decision support systems research: Reference disciplines and a cumulative traditionOmega, 1995
- Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case studyOmega, 1995
- Business computing system research: Structuring the fieldOmega, 1994