Excellent Renal Allograft Survival in Donor-Specific Antibody Positive Transplant Patients—Role of Intravenous Immunoglobulin and Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin
- 27 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 87 (2) , 227-232
- https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0b013e31818c962b
Abstract
Timely transplantation of sensitized kidney recipients remains a challenge. Patients with a complement-dependent cytotoxicity negative and flow cytometry (FC) positive crossmatch carry increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and thus graft loss. Solid phase assays are available to confirm donor specificity for antibody identified by FC crossmatch. Treatment using induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (RATG) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may allow successful transplant of these high-risk patients. A retrospective study of 264 consecutive patients after exclusions yielded 94 complement-dependent cytotoxicity anti-human globulin crossmatch-negative patients, including group 1: 58 primary transplants with panel-reactive antibody (PRA) less than 20%, group 2: 16 retransplants and PRA more than 20% who were FC crossmatch-negative, and group 3: 20 retransplants and PRA more than 20% who were FC crossmatch-positive. All were treated with RATG induction and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Only group 3 received IVIG at 500 mg/kg daily in three doses. Eighteen of 20 patients in group 3 had donor-specific antibody identified by solid phase assay. Cellular- and antibody-mediated rejections were statistically higher in group 3. Two-year serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate along with 3-year patient and graft survival were comparable between the groups. Sensitized patients with positive FC crossmatch and donor-specific antibody identified by solid phase assays can be successfully transplanted using standard RATG induction, IVIG, and maintenance immunosuppression with equal renal function and graft survival to immunologically lower risk recipients. Given these results, this patient group should not be excluded from transplantation based on antibody specificities determined by virtual crossmatch techniques.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biomarkers in transplantation: Prospective, blinded measurement of predictive value for the flow cytometry crossmatch after negative antiglobulin crossmatch in kidney transplantationKidney International, 2006
- Transplanting the Highly Sensitized Patient: The Emory AlgorithmAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2006
- Flow cytometry beads rather than the antihuman globulin method should be used to detect HLA Class I IgG antibody (PRA) in cadaveric renal regraft candidatesClinical Transplantation, 2002
- Specificity of preformed alloantibodies causing B cell positive flow crossmatch in renal transplantationClinical Transplantation, 2000
- Improved Graft Survival after Renal Transplantation in the United States, 1988 to 1996New England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- FLOW CYTOMETRY-DETECTED IgG IS NOT A CONTRAINDICATION TO RENAL TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1999
- LONG-TERM GRAFT SURVIVAL IS IMPROVED IN CADAVERIC RENAL RETRANSPLANTATION BY FLOW CYTOMETRIC CROSSMATCHING1Transplantation, 1998
- NO ADVANTAGE OF FLOW CYTOMETRY CROSSMATCH OVER COMPLEMENT-DEPENDENT CYTOTOXICITY IN IMMUNOLOGICALLY WELL-DOCUMENTED RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1996
- IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH- AND LOW-RISK SECOND KIDNEY GRAFTSTransplantation, 1996
- THE FLOW CYTOMETRIC CROSSMATCH AND EARLY RENAL TRANSPLANT LOSSTransplantation, 1990