Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Salmeterol/Fluticasone Propionate versus Montelukast in the Treatment of Adults with Persistent Asthma
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in PharmacoEconomics
- Vol. 20 (13) , 909-918
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200220130-00004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inhaled corticosteroids plus salmeterol or montelukast: Effects on resource utilization and costsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2002
- Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination compared with montelukast for the treatment of persistent asthmaAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2002
- Psychopathology in Patients with Severe Asthma Is Associated with Increased Health Care UtilizationAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2001
- Cost-Efficacy Analysis of Fluticasone Propionate versus Zafirlukast in Patients with Persistent AsthmaPharmacoEconomics, 2001
- The health economics of asthma and rhinitis. I. Assessing the economic impactJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2001
- What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 1999
- Forecasted state-specific estimates of self-reported asthma prevalence--United States, 1998.1998
- Charge what you will ... reimbursements are shrinking.1998
- Montelukast, a Once-Daily Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist, in the Treatment of Chronic AsthmaA Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind TrialArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1998
- Costs and effects of inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995