An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 2 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Genome Biology
- Vol. 8 (8) , R157
- https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2007-8-8-r157
Abstract
Background: Estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer specimens are predominantly of high grade, have frequent p53 mutations, and are broadly divided into HER2-positive and basal subtypes. Although ER-negative disease has overall worse prognosis than does ER-positive breast cancer, not all ER-negative breast cancer patients have poor clinical outcome. Reliable identification of ER-negative tumors that have a good prognosis is not yet possible. Results: We apply a recently proposed feature selection method in an integrative analysis of three major microarray expression datasets to identify molecular subclasses and prognostic markers in ER-negative breast cancer. We find a subclass of basal tumors, characterized by over-expression of immune response genes, which has a better prognosis than the rest of ER-negative breast cancers. Moreover, we show that, in contrast to ER-positive tumours, the majority of prognostic markers in ER-negative breast cancer are over-expressed in the good prognosis group and are associated with activation of complement and immune response pathways. Specifically, we identify an immune response related seven-gene module and show that downregulation of this module confers greater risk for distant metastasis (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.4; P = 0.009), independent of lymph node status and lymphocytic infiltration. Furthermore, we validate the immune response module using two additional independent datasets. Conclusion: We show that ER-negative basal breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with at least four main subtypes. Furthermore, we show that the heterogeneity in clinical outcome of ER-negative breast cancer is related to the variability in expression levels of complement and immune response pathway genes, independent of lymphocytic infiltration.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic markers in triple‐negative breast cancerCancer, 2006
- Molecular Classification and Molecular Forecasting of Breast Cancer: Ready for Clinical Application?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- An expression signature for p53 status in human breast cancer predicts mutation status, transcriptional effects, and patient survivalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2005
- A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based studyProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Statistical significance for genomewide studiesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data setsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003
- A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancerNature, 2002
- Estimating the Dimension of a ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1978