Management of bleeding in the cirrhotic patient
Open Access
- 1 April 2002
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 17 (4) , 355-360
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02723.x
Abstract
Abstract Important advances have been made in the management of variceal bleeding. Despite these advances, bleeding in the patient with cirrhosis remains one of the most demanding clinical challenges that a gastroenterologist or gastrointestinal surgeon may face. The aim is to identify the source of bleeding, control active bleeding and prevent rebleeding. This requires a multidisciplinary team, and the optimal management algorithm depends on the clinical circumstance of the patient and the local availability of endoscopic, radiological and surgical expertise. Injection sclerotherapy is effective in stopping acute variceal bleeding, but has the drawback of a high incidence of complications. Endoscopic variceal ligation is just as effective, and is associated with fewer complications. An overtube allows repeated introductions of the endoscope to be more tolerable for the patient and protects the airway against aspiration of blood; its use should be encouraged in patients with massive bleeding. Newer ligators can deliver multiple bands without removal of the scope but the high cost of these disposable devices limits their widespread use. Bleeding from gastric varices is even more challenging; the treatment of choice is injection with cyanoacrylate glue. To prevent rebleeding, beta‐blockers are recommended for all patients with large varices (including those which have never bled). Injection sclerotherapy or band ligation, conducted at weekly intervals after the initial control of bleeding, is equally effective at obliterating varices and decreasing the risk of further hemorrhage; band ligation results in fewer complications. Other newer treatment modalities for variceal bleeding, such as somatostatin analogs, transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt and liver transplantation, offer more optimal approaches to control bleeding and prevent rebleeding, but may be prohibitively expensive. Even for the most affluent communities, affordability, cost‐effectiveness, and resource rationing are important considerations in management of patients with cirrhosis complicated by gastrointestinal bleeding.© 2002 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty LtdKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early Administration of Vapreotide for Variceal Bleeding in Patients with CirrhosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Randomized controlled trial of sclerotherapy versus somatostatin infusion in the prevention of early rebleeding following acute variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosisJournal of Hepatology, 1998
- Endoscopic sclerotherapy versus variceal ligation in the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis after variceal bleeding: A prospective randomized studyJournal of Hepatology, 1997
- Comparison of endoscopic variceal injection sclerotherapy and ligation for the treatment of esophageal variceal hemorrhage: A prospective randomized trialHepatology, 1995
- A prospective randomised controlled trial comparing the efficacy of somatostatin with injection sclerotherapy in the control of bleeding oesophageal varicesJournal of Hepatology, 1992
- Endoscopic Sclerotherapy as Compared with Endoscopic Ligation for Bleeding Esophageal VaricesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- A Systematic Appraisal of Portacaval H-Graft DiametersAnnals of Surgery, 1986
- Six years' experience of oesophageal transection for oesophageal varices, using a circular stapling gun.Gut, 1982
- The National ASGE Survey on Upper Gastrointestinal BleedingGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1981
- Transabdominal suture of bleeding gastro-oesophageal varices in cryptogenic cirrhosis of the liver*British Journal of Surgery, 1977