Theories of Revolution: The Third Generation
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 32 (3) , 425-453
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010111
Abstract
The work of Ted Robert Gurr, Chalmers Johnson, Neil Smelser, Samuel P. Huntington, and Charles Tilly has dominated the recent study of revolutions. However, Jeffrey Paige, Ellen Kay Trimberger, S. N. Eisenstadt, and Theda Skocpol have lately produced theories of revolution that are far better grounded historically than those in earlier works. Five major points were neglected by earlier theorists: (1) the variable goals and structures of states; (2) the systematic intrusion of international pressures on the domestic political and economic organization of societies; (3) the structure of peasant communities; (4) the coherence or weakness of the armed forces; and (5) the variables affecting elite behavior. Starting from these points, Paige, Trimberger, Eisenstadt, and Skocpol have produced analyses of the causes and outcomes of a variety of revolutions. Yet significant challenges to the theory of revolutions—such as extending the range of cases analyzed, clarifying the grounds of peasant behavior, and tying theoretical analysis to demographic data—still remain.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Peasants and revoltsTheory and Society, 1979
- Toward a Comparative Study of RevolutionsComparative Studies in Society and History, 1976
- 'IRI': A Simplified Predictive Index of Rural InstabilityComparative Politics, 1976
- The Rebellious CenturyPublished by Harvard University Press ,1975
- Social Order, Reform and RevolutionPublished by Springer Nature ,1972
- Reflections on Revolution: Definition and Explanation in Recent ScholarshipHistory and Theory, 1972
- Explorations in the Theory of Social Movements and RevolutionsSocial Forces, 1968
- Theories of RevolutionWorld Politics, 1966
- Revolution: A RedefinitionPolitical Science Quarterly, 1962
- The International Civil WarWorld Politics, 1949