Counselling and interpersonal therapies for depression: towards securing an evidence-base

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Both generic counselling (delivered by BACP level counsellors in primary care settings) and the interpersonal therapies place a central value on the role and function of relationships – both within and outside the practice setting – as a vehicle for understanding and treating people presenting with depression. Recent studies have compared generic counselling with antidepressant medication, usual GP care, cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT), and as an adjunct to GP care (i.e. in combination with GP care). Findings suggest either that there is no difference between generic counselling and other treatment conditions, or that there are small advantages to counselling over usual GP care but only in the short-term with such differences disappearing at 1-year. Studies investigating the interpersonal therapies (IPT) have established that the content of such therapies differ in their content from behavioural and cognitive therapies despite the outcomes being broadly similar. Considerable research effort has focused on the process of change in IP therapies. Important factors include the level of prior commitment by the patient to psychological therapy and their confidence in the therapist. Patients with well assimilated problems tend to do better in CBT than psychodynamic-interpersonal therapy. Therapists need to be flexible and responsive to patient needs particularly concerning interpersonal and attachment issues. Future research in counselling needs to identify the effective components of generic counselling and relate these to a theoretical base. In the IP therapies, there needs to be a greater focus on the change outside the therapy session and on the effectiveness of such therapies in non-research settings.