Multiple Time- and Space-Scale Comparisons of ATLAS Buoy Rain Gauge Measurements with TRMM Satellite Precipitation Measurements*
Open Access
- 1 August 2003
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
- Vol. 42 (8) , 1045-1059
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<1045:mtasco>2.0.co;2
Abstract
This study compares the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) microwave imager (TMI) and precipitation radar (PR) rainfall measurements to self-siphoning rain gauge data from 14 open-ocean buoys located in heavy-rain areas of the tropical Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. These 14 buoys are part of the Tropical Atmosphere–Ocean (TAO) array and Pilot Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA). Differences between buoy and TRMM monthly and seasonal rainfall accumulations are calculated from satellite data within 0.1° × 0.1°–5.0° × 5.0° square areas centered on the buoys. Taking into account current best estimates of sampling and instrumental errors, mean differences between the buoy and TMI rainfall are not significant at the 95% confidence level, assuming no wind-induced undercatch by the buoy gauges. Mean differences between the buoy and PR monthly and seasonal accumulations for these spatial scales suggest that the PR underestimates these accumulations by about 30% in comparison wit... Abstract This study compares the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) microwave imager (TMI) and precipitation radar (PR) rainfall measurements to self-siphoning rain gauge data from 14 open-ocean buoys located in heavy-rain areas of the tropical Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. These 14 buoys are part of the Tropical Atmosphere–Ocean (TAO) array and Pilot Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA). Differences between buoy and TRMM monthly and seasonal rainfall accumulations are calculated from satellite data within 0.1° × 0.1°–5.0° × 5.0° square areas centered on the buoys. Taking into account current best estimates of sampling and instrumental errors, mean differences between the buoy and TMI rainfall are not significant at the 95% confidence level, assuming no wind-induced undercatch by the buoy gauges. Mean differences between the buoy and PR monthly and seasonal accumulations for these spatial scales suggest that the PR underestimates these accumulations by about 30% in comparison wit...Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Error analysis of TMI rainfall estimates over ocean for variational data assimilationQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2002
- Enhanced oceanic and atmospheric monitoring underway in eastern PacificEos, 2002
- Non-systematic errors of monthly oceanic rainfall derived from Passive Microwave RadiometryGeophysical Research Letters, 2001
- Rain-Profiling Algorithm for the TRMM Precipitation RadarJournal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2000
- Genesis and Evolution of the 1997-98 El NiñoScience, 1999
- The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Sensor PackageJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1998
- The Accuracy of United States Precipitation DataBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1994
- Sampling errors for satellite‐derived tropical rainfall: Monte Carlo study using a space‐time stochastic modelJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1990
- Estimation of mean rain rate: Application to satellite observationsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1990
- METHODS AND RESULTS OF DEFINITE RAIN MEASUREMENTSMonthly Weather Review, 1934