Chrysanthemums and swords: A reading of contemporary organizational communication theory and research

1 September 1985

journal article
research article
Published by Taylor & Francis in Southern Speech Communication Journal

Vol. 50 (3) , 189-200
https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372631

Abstract

CERTAIN TRUTHS ABOUT THE SOCIAL SCIENCES today seem self‐evident. One is that in recent years there has been an enormous amount of genre mixing in social science, as in intellectual life generally, and such blurring of kinds is continuing apace. Another is that many social scientists have turned away from a laws‐and‐instances ideal of explanation toward a cases‐and‐interpretations one, looking less for the sort of thing that connects planets and pendulums and more for the sort that connects chrysanthemums and swords. … Something is happening to the way we think about the way we think (Geertz, 1970, pp. 165, 166).

Keywords

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:

Conventional social science inquiry in human communication: Theory and practice
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1984
Phases, pentads, and dramatistic critical process
Central States Speech Journal, 1984
Introduction: A Code of Many Colors
Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983
Implications for psychology of the new philosophy of science.
American Psychologist, 1983
Superior–subordinate communication: The state of the art.
Psychological Bulletin, 1979
The nature of criticism in rhetorical and communicative studies
Central States Speech Journal, 1979
The reflexivity of communication research
Western Journal of Speech Communication, 1978
Toward a hermeneutic phenomenology of communication
Communication Quarterly, 1977
Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.
American Psychologist, 1975
Rhetorical criticism as argument
Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1974