An Assessment of Active Versus Passive Methods for Obtaining Parental Consent
- 1 February 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 13 (1) , 45-55
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8901300104
Abstract
This study provides new information on how passive and active consent methods work in practice. Based on results from two junior high schools, we found that (1) almost all parents received consent packages sent by regular first-class mail, but getting them to pay attention to the materials often required additional communication methods, (2) nonresponse to passive consent typically reflected conscious parental approval, (3) nonresponse to active consent generally signified latent consent, not a deliberate refusal, and (4) vigorous retrieval methods substantially raised active consent response rates, but at a high cost in time and money. These findings suggest that passive consent can provide a viable alternative to active consent when supplemented by appropriate backup and privacy safeguard measures.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do smoking prevention programs really work? Attrition and the internal and external validity of an evaluation of a refusal skills training programJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1987
- The validity of smoking self-reports by adolescents: A reexamination of the bogus pipeline procedureAddictive Behaviors, 1987
- Recent research on mailed questionnaire response ratesNew Directions for Program Evaluation, 1984
- A Comparison of Methods of Increasing Parental Consent Rates in Social ResearchPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1984
- Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescentsAddictive Behaviors, 1983
- Sample Bias Resulting From a Requirement for Written Parental ConsentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1983
- Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published LiteratureAmerican Sociological Review, 1978
- The Impact of Informed Consent Regulations On Response Rate and Response BiasSociological Methods & Research, 1977