Comparing patientsʼ and their physiciansʼ assessments of pain1
- 1 November 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 23 (3) , 273-277
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(85)90105-8
Abstract
Patients and their physicians were asked to estimate the pain from needle aspiration and/or injection of joints or soft tissue using the visual analogue scale. On a 10-point scale, the mean score for patients prior to and after the procedure was 4.76 .+-. 2.97 and 4.01 .+-. 3.51, respectively, and for physicians was 4.15 .+-. 2.45 and 3.36 .+-. 2.08. Analysis of correlations revealed that prior to the procedure patients could predict their ''true'' pain (after the procedure assessment) better (r = 0.765) than physicians could predict patients'' pain (r = 0.542). However, physicians significantly improved their estimates of patients'' scores by observing the procedure. After the procedure correlation between physicians and patient scores increased to 0.62 (P = 0.003). The overall pattern of results suggests that experienced patients may be somewhat better than their physicians in predicting the level of pain they experience with a procedure, but that physicians'' estimates appear to be accurate enough to allow them to give useful information about the degree of discomfort that a patient will experience during an invasive procedure.This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1981
- Accuracy of subjective measurements made with or without previous scores: an important source of error in serial measurement of subjective states.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1979