Educational Disabilities of Neonatal Intensive Care Graduates
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in Pediatrics
- Vol. 102 (2) , 308-314
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.102.2.308
Abstract
Objective. To determine the relationship between perinatal and sociodemographic factors in low birth weight and sick infants hospitalized at regional neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and subsequent educational disabilities. Method. NICU graduates born between 1980 and 1987 at nine statewide regionalized level III centers were located in Florida elementary schools (kindergarten through third grade) during academic year 1992–1993 (n = 9943). Educational disability was operationalized as placement into eight mutually exclusive types of special education (SE) classifications determined by statewide standardized eligibility criteria: physically impaired, sensory impaired (SI), profoundly mentally handicapped, trainable mentally handicapped, educable mentally handicapped, specific learning disabilities, emotionally handicapped, and speech and language impaired (SLI). Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds of placement in SE for selected perinatal and sociodemographic variables. Results. Placement into SE ranged from .8% for SI to 9.9% for SLI. Placement was related to four perinatal factors (birth weight, transport, medical conditions [congenital anomalies, seizures or intraventricular hemorrhage] and ventilation), and five sociodemographic factors (child's sex, mother's marital status, mother's race, mother's educational level, and family income). Perinatal factors primarily were associated with placement in physically impaired, SI, profoundly mentally handicapped, and trainable mentally handicapped. Perinatal and sociodemographic factors both were associated with placement in educable mentally handicapped and specific learning disabilities whereas sociodemographic factors primarily were associated with placement in emotionally handicapped and SLI. Conclusions. Educational disabilities of NICU graduates are influenced differently by perinatal and sociodemographic variables. Researchers must take into account both sets of these variables to ascertain the long-term risk of educational disability for NICU graduates. Birth weight alone should not be used to assess NICU morbidity outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning Disabilities Definitions and Criteria Used by State Education DepartmentsLearning Disability Quarterly, 1996
- Prediction of outcome at school entry in neonatal intensive care unit survivors, with use of clinical and electrophysiologic techniquesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1995
- School performance at nine years of age in very premature and very low birth weight infants: Perinatal risk factors and predictors at five years of ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1994
- Cognition, School Performance, and Behavior in Very Low Birth Weight and Normal Birth Weight Children at 8 Years of AgeJournal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 1993
- Can Learning Disabilities in Children Who Were Extremely Low Birth Weight Be Identified at School Entry?Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 1992
- Effects of intraventricular hemorrhage and socioeconomic status on perceptual, cognitive, and neurologic status of low birth weight infants at 5 years of ageThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1992
- A random coefficient growth curve analysis of mental development in low‐birth‐weight infantsStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Risk factors for major neurodevelopmental impairments and need for special education resources in extremely premature infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Cognitive abilities and school performance of extremely low birth weight children and matched term control children at age 8 years: A regional studyThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- The structure of learning disabilitiesExceptionality, 1991