Experimental Evolution and the Krogh Principle: Generating Biological Novelty for Functional and Genetic Analyses
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Physiological and Biochemical Zoology
- Vol. 76 (1) , 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1086/374275
Abstract
August Krogh counseled the careful selection of the best subject organism on which to undertake mechanistic physiological research. But what if an organism with the desired properties does not exist? It is now within our power to engineer organisms genetically to achieve novel combinations of traits. I propose that it is a logical extension of the Krogh principle that we use biological methodologies to create novel organisms ideally suited for particular physiological studies. Transgenics may first come to mind as the method for such transformations, but here I suggest that an alternative and complementary technique for generating biological novelty is experimental evolution. The latter has several advantages, including modification of multiple characters in one experiment, the production of advantageous traits, the testing of evolutionary hypotheses, and the identification of previously unsuspected factors involved in adaptation. Three experiments are reviewed, each of which examined the evolution of different physiological characters in different environments and organisms: locomotor performance in mice, desiccation tolerance in fruit flies, and high temperature adaptation in bacteria. While diverse in experimental type and subject, all resulted in the successful production of new variants with enhanced function in their new environments. Each experiment successfully tested hypotheses concerning physiological evolution, and in each case, unanticipated results emerged, which suggests previously unsuspected adaptive pathways and mechanisms. In addition, replicate populations in each experiment adjusted to their common environments by several different means, which indicates that physiological evolution may follow diverse stochastic pathways during adaptation. Experimental evolution can be a valuable method to produce and investigate new physiological variants and traits. The choice of experimental subjects, according to the Krogh principle, is no longer limited to currently existing organisms but is open to our imaginations and our ingenuityKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic architecture of thermal adaptation in Escherichia coliProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Evolutionary PhysiologyAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2000
- Laboratory selection experiments using Drosophila: what do they really tell us?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2000
- Behaviour of house mice artificially selected for high levels of voluntary wheel runningAnimal Behaviour, 1999
- An Introduction to Phylogenetically Based Statistical Methods, with a New Method for Confidence Intervals on Ancestral ValuesAmerican Zoologist, 1999
- Experimental Evolution and Its Role in Evolutionary PhysiologyAmerican Zoologist, 1999
- Physiological Responses to Selection for Desiccation Resistance inDrosophila melanogasterAmerican Zoologist, 1999
- Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and Divergence During 2,000 GenerationsThe American Naturalist, 1991
- Uniform Selection as a Diversifying Force in Evolution: Evidence from DrosophilaThe American Naturalist, 1989
- The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programmeProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1979