Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment
- 1 September 1987
- journal article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics
- Vol. 17 (5) , 753-770
- https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1987.6499282
Abstract
In contrast to the usual indirect comparison of intuitive cognitive activity with a normative model, direct comparisons were made of expert highway engineers' use of analytical, quasi-rational, and intuitive cognition on three different tasks, each displayed in three different ways. Use of a systems approach made it possible to develop indices for measuring the location of each of the nine information display conditions on a continuum ranging from intuition inducing to analysis inducing and for measuring the location of each expert engineer's cognition on a continuum ranging from intuition to analysis. Individual analyses of each expert's performance over the nine conditions showed that the location of the task on the task index induced cognition to be located at the corresponding region on the cognitive continuum index. Surprisingly, intuitive and quasi-rational cognition frequently outperformed analytical cognition in terms of the empirical accuracy of judgments. Judgmental accuracy was related to the degree of correspondence between the type of task (intuition inducing versus analysis inducing) and the type of the experts' cognitive activity (intuition versus analysis) on the cognitive continuum.Keywords
This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: