Interaction between the vestibulo‐collic reflex and the cervico‐collic stretch reflex in the decerebrate cat.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. Interactions between the sagittal vestibulo-collic reflex (v.c.r.) and the cervico-collic stretch reflex (c.c.r.) have been studied in the neck extensor muscles biventer cercicis (b.c.) in the decerebrate cat. The v.c.r. was evoked by a ''standard'' vestibular stimulus consisting of a sinusoidal nose-up, nose-down head movement of 6-8 deg amplitude at 1 Hz. The c.c.r. was evoked by sinusoidal stretching of the b.c. muscles at 1 Hz. The amplitude of muscle stretching, and its phase in relation to head movement, were systematically varied. 2. When muscle stretching was applied in phase with head movement (so that the muscles were stretched as the head moved in the nose-down direction), the gain of the combined (v.c.r. + c.c.r.) reflex in the b.c. muscles increased above that of the v.c.r. If the muscle stretching was applied out of phase with head movement (so that the muscles shortened as the head moved downward), the gain of the combined relex was reduced to a value below that of the v.c.r. 3. The effects on the gain of the combined reflex varied in proportion to the amplitude of muscle stretching. The gain and phase of the combined reflex is modelled reasonably well by a linear vectorial between the v.c.r. and the c.c.r. over a wide range of amplitudes of muscle stretching. The linear summation model contains a proportionality constant K, which may represent a factor by which the two reflexes are ''calibrated'' against each other. 4. If one of the b.c. muscles was held at a fixed length and the other stretched sinusoidally, the c.c.r. was evoked only in the stimulated muscle. Vestibular stimulation then summed with the c.c.r. in the stimulated muscle, while on the contralateral side the reflex response was the same as that of the v.c.r. alone. It would appear therefore that the motoneurone pools of the b.c. muscles are organized as independent entities without mutually excitatory or inhibitory reflex linkages. This arrangement presumably allows flexibility in the supraspinal control of the b.c. muscles, which are often used either as synergists during sagittal head movement or as antagonists during horizontal or roll movements of the head. 5. The interaction between the v.c.r. and the c.c.r. results in an apparent ''servo-assistance'' role for the muscle afferent feed-back from the b.c. muscles, amplifying or attenuating the reflex response of the muscles to a given head movement. This is consistent with the concept of ''automatic compensation of reflex gain'' (Matthews, 1986), and we suggest that such a role for muscle afferent feed-back may be a common principle in the organization of motor systems.