Understanding speech in modulated interference: Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners
Top Cited Papers
- 28 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 113 (2) , 961-968
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1531983
Abstract
Many competing noises in real environments are modulated or fluctuating in level. Listeners with normal hearing are able to take advantage of temporal gaps in fluctuating maskers. Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss show less benefit from modulated maskers. Cochlear implant users may be more adversely affected by modulated maskers because of their limited spectral resolution and by their reliance on envelope-based signal-processing strategies of implant processors. The current study evaluated cochlear implant users’ ability to understand sentences in the presence of modulated speech-shaped noise. Normal-hearing listeners served as a comparison group. Listeners repeated IEEE sentences in quiet, steady noise, and modulated noise maskers. Maskers were presented at varying signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) at six modulation rates varying from 1 to 32 Hz. Results suggested that normal-hearing listeners obtain significant release from masking from modulated maskers, especially at 8-Hz masker modulation frequency. In contrast, cochlear implant users experience very little release from masking from modulated maskers. The data suggest, in fact, that they may show negative effects of modulated maskers at syllabic modulation rates (2–4 Hz). Similar patterns of results were obtained from implant listeners using three different devices with different speech-processor strategies. The lack of release from masking occurs in implant listeners independent of their device characteristics, and may be attributable to the nature of implant processing strategies and/or the lack of spectral detail in processed stimuli.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002
- Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: Masking release or modulation interference?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001
- Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001
- Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: Acoustic and electric hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998
- The Effects of Hearing Loss and Noise Masking on the Masking Release for Speech in Temporally Complex BackgroundsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1998
- Effect of Relative Amplitude and Formant Transitions on Perception of Place of Articulation by Adult Listeners With Cochlear ImplantsJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1997
- Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996
- Speech Recognition in Amplitude-Modulated Noise of Listeners With Normal and Listeners With Impaired HearingJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1995
- Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990