Diagnosing DSM-IV—Part II: Eysenck (1986) and the essentialist fallacy
- 31 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Vol. 35 (7) , 651-665
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00019-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosing DSM-IV—Part I: DSM-IV and the concept of disorderBehaviour Research and Therapy, 1997
- Limits of operationalization: A critique of Spitzer and Endicott's (1978) proposed operational criteria for mental disorder.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1993
- The concept of mental disorder: On the boundary between biological facts and social values.American Psychologist, 1992
- Disorder as harmful dysfunction: A conceptual critique of DSM-III-R's definition of mental disorder.Psychological Review, 1992
- What Is a Case?Archives of General Psychiatry, 1988
- Diagnosis and Clinical Assessment: The DSM-IIIAnnual Review of Psychology, 1983
- What Does the P Scale Measure?The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1974
- ‘Psychoticism’ and Psychotic IllnessThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 1974
- The position of hysterics and dysthymics in a two-dimensional framework of personality description.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962
- PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS AS A PSYCHOLOGICAL AND STATISTICAL PROBLEMPsychological Reports, 1955