Wild Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Control in Processing Peas (Pisum sativum) and Soybeans (Glycine max)
- 1 January 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Weed Science
- Vol. 30 (4) , 365-368
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043174500040765
Abstract
Field studies in 1978 and 1979 evaluated the effectiveness of single and combination herbicide treatments in processing peas (Pisum sativum L.) and soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] for the control of wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Eight treatments that included dinitroaniline herbicides controlled wild proso millet adequately through the entire growing season of the early-planted peas (approximately 60 days). Wild proso millet emergence and growth in untreated peas was suppressed by the early emergence, rapid growth, and high plant density of the drill-planted crop. Trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) at 0.8 kg/ha stunted pea growth and was the only treatment that reduced yields significantly. No herbicide treatment evaluated in soybeans controlled wild proso millet adequately for the entire growing season without reducing soybean growth and yield. Treatments containing dinitroaniline herbicides, which controlled wild proso millet in peas and resulted in good yield, did not perform similarly in soybeans.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selective Control of Weeds in Proso Millet with HerbicidesWeed Science, 1971
- Photosynthesis: Temperate and Tropical Characteristics within a Single Grass GenusScience, 1969
- Response of Peas (Pisum sativum L.) to Plant Population and Spacing1Agronomy Journal, 1968
- Carbon dioxide compensation—its relation to photosynthetic carboxylation reactions, systematics of the Gramineae, and leaf anatomyCanadian Journal of Botany, 1968
- Competition between Peas Grown for Processing and WeedsWeeds, 1962
- Plant Population and Weed Growth Relations in Canning PeasWeeds, 1961