Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
- Vol. 6 (1) , 19-27
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3
Abstract
The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the absence of fine spectro-temporal cues may contribute to poorer performance in noise, especially when the noise is dynamic (e.g., competing speaker or modulated noise). Here we report on sentence recognition by cochlear implant users and by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant, in the presence of steady or square-wave modulated speech-shaped noise. Implant users were tested using their everyday, clinically assigned speech processors. In the acoustic simulation, normal-hearing listeners were tested for different degrees of spectral resolution (16, eight, or four channels) and spectral smearing (carrier filter slopes of −24 or −6 dB/octave). For modulated noise, normal-hearing listeners experienced significant release from masking when the original, unprocessed speech was presented (which preserved the spectro-temporal fine structure), while cochlear implant users experienced no release from masking. As the spectral resolution was reduced, normal-hearing listeners’ release from masking gradually diminished. Release from masking was further reduced as the degree of spectral smearing increased. Interestingly, the mean speech recognition thresholds of implant users were very close to those of normal-hearing subjects listening to four-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. Also, the best cochlear implant listeners performed like normal-hearing subjects listening to eight- to 16-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. These findings suggest that implant users’ susceptibility to noise may be caused by the reduced spectral resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with channel interaction. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral channels as well as reduce channel interactions may improve implant performance in noise, especially for temporally modulated noise.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1994
- Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in noiseThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993
- Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. IIThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1993
- Effects of Noise and Noise Suppression on Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant UsersEar & Hearing, 1992
- Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. IThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1992
- Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI)The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1991
- Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1990
- Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1987
- Speech Perception Using a Two-formant 22-Electrode Cochlear Prosthesis in Quiet and in NoiseActa Oto-Laryngologica, 1987