A criterion validity test of the contingent valuation method: comparing hypothetical and actual voting behavior for a public referendum
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Vol. 45 (3) , 631-649
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00017-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? A commentJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Applying contingent valuation in the design of fee hunting programs: Pheasant hunting in oregon revisitedHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 1998
- Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-vote RecommendationThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?Journal of Political Economy, 1997
- Searching for the Correct Benefit Estimate: Empirical Evidence for an Alternative PerspectiveLand Economics, 1996
- Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public GoodsLand Economics, 1996
- The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should CareJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1994
- Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-Ended" Contingent Valuation SurveysThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1987
- Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979