Tod's Rajast'han and the Boundaries of Imperial Rule in Nineteenth-Century India
- 1 February 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Modern Asian Studies
- Vol. 30 (1) , 185-220
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x0001413x
Abstract
This essay concerns the labile boundary between the familiar and the exotic in an early nineteenth-century Orientalist text, entitledAnnals and Antiquities of Rajast'han, by James Tod. Written by the first British political agent to the western Rajput states, Tod'sRajast'han, particularly the several chapters he devoted to the so-called ‘feudal system’ of Rajasthan, remained implicated in colonial policy toward western India for over a century. By situating Tod'sRajast'hanin the specific circumstances in which it was written and then tracing the fate of that text against a historical background, this essay aims to restore an open-ended, historical sensibility to studies on Orientalism that most critics of Orientalist writing have ironically forfeited in their laudable efforts to restore history to the indigenous peoples who have been the objects of Orientalist discourse.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowing the Country: Empire and Information in IndiaModern Asian Studies, 1993
- The Company Army and Rural Society: The Invalid Thanah 1780–1830Modern Asian Studies, 1993
- Ungoverned ImaginingsPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1992
- South Asia, the World System, and World CapitalismJournal of Asian Studies, 1990
- Orientalist Constructions of IndiaModern Asian Studies, 1986
- being “Maasai”; being “people‐of‐cattle”: ethnic shifters in East AfricaAmerican Ethnologist, 1982
- A Liberal DescentPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1981
- Outline of a Theory of PracticePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1977
- The Slow Conquest: Administrative Integration of Malwa into the Maratha Empire, 1720–1760Modern Asian Studies, 1977
- The Emergence of Indian NationalismPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1968