Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports
Top Cited Papers
- 30 July 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Management
- Vol. 39 (1) , 48-75
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455245
Abstract
The authors content analyzed self-reported limitations and directions for future research in 1,276 articles published between 1982 and 2007 in the Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, the Journal of Applied Psychology, the Journal of Management, and the Strategic Management Journal. In order of frequency, the majority of self-reported limitations, as well as directions for future research, pertains to threats to internal, external, and construct validity issues, and there is a significant increase in the reporting of these elements over time. Longitudinal analyses revealed that some of these increases varied across management subfields (i.e., business policy and strategy, organizational behavior, organizational theory, and human resource management), indicating unique research contexts within some research domains. Based on the analyses of self-reported limitations and future research directions, the authors offer eight guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors. These guidelines refer to the need for authors to report limitations and to use a separate section for them and the need for reviewers to list limitations in their evaluations of manuscripts; authors and reviewers should prioritize limitations, and authors should report them in a way that describes their consequences for the interpretation of results. The guidelines for directions for future research focus on positioning them as a starting point for future research endeavors and for the advancement of theoretical issues. The authors also offer recommendations on how to use limitations and future research directions for the training of researchers. It is hoped that the adoption of these proposed guidelines and recommendations will maximize their value so that they can serve as true catalysts for further scientific progress in the field of management.Keywords
This publication has 82 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Fox in the Hen House: A Critical Examination of Plagiarism Among Members of the Academy of ManagementAcademy of Management Learning & Education, 2012
- Do Theories of Organizations Progress?Organizational Research Methods, 2010
- What Is Method Variance and How Can We Cope With It? A Panel DiscussionOrganizational Research Methods, 2010
- Publishing today is more difficult than everJournal of Organizational Behavior, 2009
- Retraction rates are on the riseEMBO Reports, 2008
- First Decade of Organizational Research MethodsOrganizational Research Methods, 2007
- Designing Experiments That GeneralizeOrganizational Research Methods, 2007
- Contextualizing Methods Choice in Organizational ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 2007
- The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational BehaviorAcademy of Management Review, 2006
- Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreementJournal of Applied Statistics, 1997