Sometimes sensitive, seldom specific: A review of the economics of screening
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Health Economics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 43-53
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4730020106
Abstract
As the policy relevance of screening has increased, the application of the techniques of economic evaluation to screening has become widespread. This paper critically reviews the literature, and in so doing, highlights several ways in which future evaluations might be improved. These include: the adoption of a broader perspective regarding the questions to be addressed and the relevant margins; a reconsideration of the nature of the benefits and how they might be valued; and a greater emphasis being placed upon the role of individual behaviour and its potential impact on the outcome of economic evaluations.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qaly league tables: Handle with careHealth Economics, 1993
- Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: the effect of routine ultrasound scan determination of gestational age and adjustment for maternal weightBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992
- Willingness-to-Pay as a Measure of BenefitsMedical Care, 1991
- Appraisal of a new scheme for prenatal screening for Down's syndrome.BMJ, 1991
- The significance of contextual factors in valuing health statesHealth Policy, 1989
- THE NORMATIVE ECONOMICS OF HEALTH CARE FINANCE AND PROVISIONOxford Review of Economic Policy, 1989
- Value of a negative cervical smearBMJ, 1988
- What Do Patients Value?Medical Care, 1985
- Prevention and cure?Journal of Health Economics, 1983
- Choice of screening tests.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1978