The Impact of Chemotherapy on the Survival of Patients With High-grade Primary Extremity Liposarcoma
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 240 (4) , 686-697
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141710.74073.0d
Abstract
To determine if chemotherapy offers a survival benefit to patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma. The impact of chemotherapy on the survival of patients with primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma is controversial and its effect on individual histologic subtypes is not defined. Two prospectively collected sarcoma databases were used to identify all patients with >5 cm, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma that underwent surgical treatment of cure from 1975 to 2003 (n = 245). Clinical, pathologic and treatment variables were analyzed for disease-specific survival (DSS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Sixty-three (26%) patients were treated with ifosfamide based chemotherapy (IF), 83 (34%) with doxorubicin based chemotherapy (DOX) and 99 (40%) received no chemotherapy (NoC). To assess the impact of DOX, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1975 to 1990 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the DOX treated patients was 64% (53%–74%) compared with 56% (51%–79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.28). To assess the impact of IF, a contemporary cohort analysis of patients treated from 1990 to 2003 was performed. The 5 year DSS of the IF treated patients was 92% (84%–100%) compared with 65% (51%–79%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.0003). Independent prognostic factors for improved DSS were smaller size (HR = 0.7, P = 0.01), myxoid/round cell histologic subtype (HR = 0.3, P = 0.03) and treatment with IF (HR = 0.3, P = 0.01). The five-year DRFS of the IF treated patients was 81% (70%–92%) compared with 63% (50%–76%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.02). The 5 year LRFS of the IF treated patients was 86% (76%–96%) compared with 87% (77%–97%) for the NoC patients (log-rank P value = 0.99). In patients with large, high-grade, primary extremity liposarcoma; DOX is not associated with improved DSS and IF is associated with an improved DSS. Treatment with IF should be considered in patients with high-risk primary extremity liposarcoma.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Histologic Subtype and Margin of Resection Predict Pattern of Recurrence and Survival for Retroperitoneal LiposarcomaAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue SarcomasAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Pleomorphic Liposarcoma: Clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Follow-up Analysis of 63 CasesThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2002
- A randomised phase II study on neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for ‘high-risk’ adult soft-tissue sarcomaEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2001
- Liposarcoma: New entities and evolving conceptsAnnals of Diagnostic Pathology, 2000
- The reason for confining the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma to the investigational settingSeminars in Radiation Oncology, 1999
- Dedifferentiated LiposarcomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1997
- Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma Clinicopathologic Analysis of 32 Cases Suggesting a Better Prognostic Subgroup Among Pleomorphic SarcomasThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1994
- Prognostic Factors Predictive of Survival and Local Recurrence for Extremity Soft Tissue SarcomaAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- The prognostic value of histologic subtypes in primary extremity liposarcomaCancer, 1989