The Inflatable Penile Prosthesis, Reoperation and Patient Satisfaction: A Comparison of Statistics Obtained from Patient Record Review with Statistics Obtained from Intensive Followup Search
- 1 May 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 131 (5) , 894-895
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50698-9
Abstract
Of 179 patients who received the inflatable penile prosthesis 43% required reoperation, 60% of which were performed for mechanical failure. An attempt to evaluate the adequacy of chart review in assessing current function and patient satisfaction was made by comparing reports obtained by chart review to those obtained by direct patient interview. If chart review alone was used malfunction would have been underestimated by 13% and patient satisfaction overestimated by 21%. The importance of direct followup in evaluating patients with the inflatable penile prosthesis is demonstrated.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications of inflatable penile prosthesesUrology, 1981
- Management of neurogenic impotence with inflatable penile prosthesisUrology, 1981
- Comparison of the Inflatable Penile and the Small-Carrion Prostheses in the Surgical Treatment of Erectile ImpotenceJournal of Urology, 1980
- Inflatable penile prosthesisUrology, 1979
- Surgical Management of Impotence using the Inflatable Penile Prosthesis: Experience with 103 PatientsBritish Journal of Urology, 1978
- Surgical Treatment of Erectile Impotence with Inflatable Penile ProsthesisJournal of Urology, 1977