Enteral nutrition-related gastrointestinal complications in critically ill patients
- 1 August 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 27 (8) , 1447-1453
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199908000-00006
Abstract
To evaluate the frequency of gastrointestinal complications (GICs) in a prospective cohort of critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition and to assess its effect on nutrient administration and its relationship to the patient's outcome. Multicenter, prospective cohort study. Thirty-seven multidisciplinary intensive care units (ICUs) in Spain. Prospective cohort of 400 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU and receiving enteral nutrition. Noninterventional, follow-up study. Enteral nutrition-related GICs and their management were defined by consensus before data collection. A set of variables related to enteral nutrition administration and the presence of GICs was recorded. During the 1-month study period, 400 patients were enrolled, and a total of 3,778 enteral feeding days were analyzed. The mean time of enteral nutrition was 9.6 +/- 0.4 days. Mean elapsed time from ICU admission to the start of enteral feeding was 3.1 +/- 0.2 days. A total of 265 patients (66.2%) received a standard polymeric formula, and 132 (33.8%) received a disease-specific one. Enteral feeds were administered mainly through a nasogastric tube (91%). One or more GICs were presented by 251 patients (62.8%) during the feeding course. The frequency of each particular GIC was as follows: high gastric residuals, 39%; constipation, 15.7%; diarrhea, 14.7%; abdominal distention, 13.2%; vomiting, 12.2%; and regurgitation, 5.5%. Enteral nutrition withdrawal as a consequence of noncontrollable GICs occurred in 15.2% of patients. The volume ratio (expressed as the ratio between administered and prescribed volumes) was calculated daily and was used as an index of diet administration efficacy. Patients with GICs had a lower volume ratio than did patients without GICs (63.1 +/- 1.2% vs. 93.3 +/- 0.3%) (p < .001), a longer length of stay (20.6 +/- 1.2 vs. 15.2 +/- 1.3 days) (p < .01), and higher mortality (31% vs. 16.1%) (p < .001). The frequency of enteral nutrition-related GICs in critically ill patients is high. High gastric residuals is the most frequent GIC. These complications decreased nutrient intake and, if persistent, could expose the patients to undernutrition. Enteral feeding gastrointestinal intolerance seems to have an evolutive effect in prolonging the ICU stay and increasing patient mortality. (Crit Care Med 1999; 27:1447-1453)Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Artificial nutrition support in hospitals in the UnitedKingdom — 1994: Third national surveyClinical Nutrition, 1995
- Effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition on gut mucosal permeability in the critically ill.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1995
- Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patientCritical Care Medicine, 1995
- Detecting Pulmonary Aspiration of Enteral Feeding in Intubated PatientsChest, 1994
- STRATEGIES FOR ATTENUATING PROTEIN-CATABOLIC RESPONSES IN THE CRITICALLY ILLAnnual Review of Medicine, 1994
- Enteral nutrition in the critically ill patient: A critical review of the evidenceIntensive Care Medicine, 1993
- Early Enteral Feeding, Compared With Parenteral, Reduces Postoperative Septic Complications The Results of a Meta-AnalysisAnnals of Surgery, 1992
- Enteral Versus Parenteral Feeding Effects on Septic Morbidity After Blunt and Penetrating Abdominal TraumaAnnals of Surgery, 1992
- The effect of route of nutrient administration on the nutritional state, catabolic hormone secretion, and gut mucosal integrity after burn injuryJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1987
- Complications Occurring during Enteral Nutrition Support: A Prospective StudyJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1983