Bias Correction with a Single Null Marker for Population Stratification in Candidate Gene Association Studies
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Human Heredity
- Vol. 59 (3) , 165-175
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000085940
Abstract
Population stratification is a form of confounding by ethnicity that may cause bias to effect estimates and inflate test statistics in genetic association studies. Unlinked genetic markers have been used to adjust for test statistics, but their use in correcting biased effect estimates has not been addressed. We evaluated the potential of bias correction that could be achieved by a single null marker (M) in studies involving one candidate gene (G). When the distribution of M varied greatly across ethnicities, controlling for M in a logistic regression model substantially reduced biases on odds ratio estimates. When M had same distributions as G across ethnicities, biases were further reduced or eliminated by subtracting the regression coefficient of M from the coefficient of G in the model, which was fitted either with or without a multiplicative interaction term between M and G. Correction of bias due to population stratification depended specifically on the distributions of G and M, the difference between baseline disease risks across ethnicities, and whether G had an effect on disease risk or not. Our results suggested that marker choice and the specific treatment of that marker in analysis greatly influenced bias correction.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Putative Ancestral Origins of Chromosomal Segments in Individual African Americans: Implications for Admixture MappingGenome Research, 2004
- Evaluating bias due to population stratification in case‐control association studies of admixed populationsGenetic Epidemiology, 2004
- Informativeness of Genetic Markers for Inference of Ancestry*American Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- Association studies for quantitative traits in structured populationsGenetic Epidemiology, 2001
- Unbiased methods for population‐based association studiesGenetic Epidemiology, 2001
- Accounting for Unmeasured Population Substructure in Case-Control Studies of Genetic Association Using a Novel Latent-Class ModelAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2001
- Association Mapping in Structured PopulationsAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2000
- Use of Unlinked Genetic Markers to Detect Population Stratification in Association StudiesAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 1999
- Biased estimates of treatment effect in randomized experiments with nonlinear regressions and omitted covariatesBiometrika, 1984
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Misspecified ModelsEconometrica, 1982