Bounded Ethicality
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 20 (3) , 378-384
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02296.x
Abstract
Ethical decision making is vulnerable to the forces of automaticity. People behave differently in the face of a potential loss versus a potential gain, even when the two situations are transparently identical. Across three experiments, decision makers engaged in more unethical behavior if a decision was presented in a loss frame than if the decision was presented in a gain frame. In Experiment 1 , participants in the loss-frame condition were more likely to favor gathering “insider information” than were participants in the gain-frame condition. In Experiment 2 , negotiators in the loss-frame condition lied more than negotiators in the gain-frame condition. In Experiment 3 , the tendency to be less ethical in the loss-frame condition occurred under time pressure and was eliminated through the removal of time pressure.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- 13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re GoingAcademy of Management Annals, 2008
- Neural Correlates of Adaptive Decision Making for Risky Gains and LossesPsychological Science, 2007
- Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human BrainScience, 2006
- Loss Aversion Is an Affective Forecasting ErrorPsychological Science, 2006
- The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral JudgmentNeuron, 2004
- Goals as Reference PointsCognitive Psychology, 1999
- Framing and situational ethicsMarketing Letters, 1994
- Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase TheoremJournal of Political Economy, 1990
- The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of ChoiceScience, 1981
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979