Influence of Ankle Support on Joint Range of Motion Before and After Exercise: A Meta-Analysis
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT) in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
- Vol. 30 (4) , 170-182
- https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2000.30.4.170
Abstract
Meta-analysis. To evaluate the effects of different types of ankle support on ankle and foot joint range of motion before and after activity using meta-analysis procedures. The effects of ankle support on joint range of motion before and after exercise has been extensively studied, but the results among studies are not consistent. Obtaining knowledge from synthesizing the available literature with a meta-analysis can provide a greater understanding of these effects. A total of 253 cases from 19 studies were examined and included in this analysis. The treatment variables were ankle support with 3 levels (tape, lace-up, and semirigid) and time with 2 levels (before exercise and after exercise). Standardized effect sizes were computed for inversion, eversion, dorsiflexion, and plantar flexion range of motion to measure the difference between control and treatment groups at each point in time. Effect sizes were analyzed using a mixed-model factorial analysis of variance. Before exercise, the semirigid condition (-2.97 +/- 0.63) demonstrated greater restriction compared with the tape (-2.33 +/- 0.38) and lace-up conditions (-2.18 +/- 0.86) for inversion range of motion. After exercise, the semirigid condition (-3.85 +/- 0.64) restricted inversion range of motion more than the tape (-1.07 +/- 0.20) and lace-up (-1.56 +/- 0.29) conditions. No differences were found between the mean effect sizes for the tape and lace-up conditions before and after exercise. With respect to eversion range of motion, the semirigid support (-2.69 +/- 0.43) provided greater restraint compared with the tape (-1.00 +/- 0.21) and lace-up (-1.40 +/- 0.47) conditions. The lace-up condition also displayed greater support compared with tape alone. For dorsiflexion range of motion, greatest overall support was provided by the tape condition (-0.94 +/- 0.06) compared with the lace-up condition (-0.51 +/- 0.06). The greatest restriction of motion in the frontal plane was offered by the semirigid support condition, whereas taping offered the most support for limiting dorsiflexion range of motion. The results of this study may help clinicians make rational decisions concerning the selection of ankle appliances for preventing acute or chronic reinjury.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of Prophylactic Ankle Stabilisers for Prevention of Ankle InjuriesSports Medicine, 1995
- A Fivefold Reduction in the Incidence of Recurrent Ankle Sprains in Soccer Players Using the Sport-Stirrup OrthosisThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994
- The Efficacy of a Semirigid Ankle Stabilizer to Reduce Acute Ankle Injuries in BasketballThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1994
- An Approach for Assessing Publication Bias Prior to Performing a Meta-AnalysisStatistical Science, 1992
- Retrospective comparison of taping and ankle stabilizers in preventing ankle injuriesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1988
- Meta‐analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline. I: Control of bias and comparison with large co‐operative trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1987
- Review of developments in meta-analytic method.Psychological Bulletin, 1986
- The effects of ankle guards and taping on joint motion before, during, and after a squash matchThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1984
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- The prevention and treatment of ankle injuriesThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1976