Peer Review and Federal Regulations
- 8 January 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 350 (2) , 103-104
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp038230
Abstract
Federal regulations that affect science and health are frequently controversial. Whether the topic is air pollution, stem-cell research, clean needles for injection-drug users, or pharmaceutical advertising, powerful economic and social interests are often at stake. It is hard to dispute the view that federal regulations — or the information disseminated by the federal government, more generally — should be based on data of the highest quality. It is far more difficult, however, for scientists and government officials to agree about how to achieve this goal and to keep political considerations from trumping science when policies are created. Former president Bill . . .Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the Harvard Six Cities Study of Particulate Air Pollution and MortalityNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Induced Abortion and the Risk of Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- An Association between Air Pollution and Mortality in Six U.S. CitiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993