Insulator, metal, or superconductor: The criteria
- 1 April 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review B
- Vol. 47 (13) , 7995-8007
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.47.7995
Abstract
The appropriate infinite-wavelength →0 and zero-frequency ω→0 limits of the paramagnetic current-current correlation function provide criteria for determining whether a system is insulating, metallic, or superconducting. Here we discuss these criteria for lattice models and present Monte Carlo data for the two-dimensional positive- and negative-U Hubbard models that imply that the ground state of the half-filled positive-U Hubbard model is an insulator, the doped state is a metal, and the negative-U Hubbard model is a superconductor.
Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Superfluid density and the Drude weight of the Hubbard modelPhysical Review Letters, 1992
- Drude weight, optical conductivity, and flux properties of one-dimensional Hubbard ringsPhysical Review B, 1991
- Finite-size effects on the optical conductivity of a half-filled Hubbard ringPhysical Review B, 1991
- Constructing quasiparticle operators in strongly correlated systemsPhysical Review B, 1991
- Correlations in the two-dimensional Hubbard modelPhysical Review B, 1991
- Twisted boundary conditions and effective mass in Heisenberg-Ising and Hubbard ringsPhysical Review Letters, 1990
- Numerical Studies on the Hubbard Model and thet-JModel in One- and Two-DimensionsJournal of the Physics Society Japan, 1989
- Antiferromagnetism in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard ModelPhysical Review Letters, 1989
- Theory of the Insulating StatePhysical Review B, 1964
- Zur Theorie des Diamagnetismus von LeitungselektronenThe European Physical Journal A, 1933