The Price Is (Almost) Right
- 25 November 2009
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 64 (6) , 2739-2782
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01516.x
Abstract
Most previous research tests market efficiency using average abnormal trading profits on dynamic trading strategies, and typically rejects the joint hypothesis of market efficiency and an asset pricing model. In contrast, we adopt the perspective of a buy‐and‐hold investor and examine stock price levels. For such an investor, the price level is more relevant than the short‐horizon expected return, and betas of cash flow fundamentals are more important than high‐frequency stock return betas. Our cross‐sectional tests suggest that there exist specifications in which differences in relative price levels of individual stocks can be largely explained by their fundamental betas.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Value SpreadThe Journal of Finance, 2003
- Market Timing and Capital StructureThe Journal of Finance, 2002
- Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929 to 1997The Journal of Finance, 2000
- Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing AnomaliesThe Journal of Finance, 1996
- Another Look at the Cross‐section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Size and Book‐to‐Market Factors in Earnings and ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1995
- Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and RiskThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1992
- CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*The Journal of Finance, 1964