Selection and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Health Outcome Measures
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The European Journal of General Practice
- Vol. 4 (1) , 27-33
- https://doi.org/10.3109/13814789809160783
Abstract
In evaluating health care there is often a need to go beyond simple measures of health like morbidity and mortality, and look at changes in patients’ quantity as well as quality of life. An ever-growing number of instruments are available. The article focuses on issues related to the selection of instruments for the assessment of health status and health outcome. The aim is to provide the reader with a series of questions to be considered in choosing and using an instrument or adapting one for use in a particular culture. The theoretical concept of health and its relevant components must be assessed. The researcher must furthermore assess the purpose of measuring health, conceptual underpinning of the chosen health measure, from whose perspective the assessment should be made, target population, setting in which the instrument is to be administered, and type of instrument (e.g. a generic versus an illness-specific instrument) and its psychometric properties as well as practical requirements in administering the instrument. The specific considerations in adopting an instrument for cross-cultural use include procedures for translation.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instrumentsPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Cross-cultural adaptation of health measuresPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Critical review of the international assessments of health-related quality of lifeQuality of Life Research, 1993
- Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelinesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study ApproachPublished by Rand Corporation ,1992
- Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: An analogy to diagnostic test performanceJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1986