Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies
Top Cited Papers
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 111 (1) , 9-14
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00154-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Obstetric and neonatal outcome of babies weighing more than 4.5 kg: an analysis by parityEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2000
- Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: Is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia?The Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 2000
- Observational study of maternal anthropometry and fetal insulinArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 1999
- Prophylactic cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by means of ultrasonography—A Faustian bargain?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in CaliforniaAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Is Macrosomia Predictable, and Are Shoulder Dystocia and Birth Trauma Preventable?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Clinical and ultrasound prediction of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- The quality of routinely collected maternity dataBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repairBMJ, 1994
- Customised antenatal growth chartsThe Lancet, 1992