The Association Between Measures of Progression and Survival in Castrate-Metastatic Prostate Cancer
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 13 (5) , 1488-1492
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-1885
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the association between progression-free survival and overall survival time in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with microtubule-targeted therapies. Experimental Design: We retrospectively studied patients treated in three trials evaluating a taxane or an epothilone for progressive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Study subjects were 98 patients with bone metastases; 63 of them also had soft tissue lesions. All scans were reviewed independently. Associations of radiographic progression-free survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival with survival time were measured using Kendall's τ, adjusted for right censoring. A smoothing procedure was applied to estimate Kendall's τ within each neighborhood of the follow-up process. Results: The overall associations between progression-free survival time and overall survival time were moderate: 0.4 for radiographic progression-free survival and 0.33 for PSA progression-free survival. The association between radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival was weakest early in the follow-up process, whereas the PSA association was weakest when the progression-free survival–related event (PSA progression, death, or censoring) occurred after 6 months from the start of treatment. Conclusions: Current measures of progression-free survival time for men with castration-resistant prostate cancer are not strongly concordant with survival time. Factors that attenuate the association include interval censoring and the discontinuation of therapy early in the follow-up due to imaging changes that may not reflect true failure of the treatment. For radiographic progression-free survival, the association may be increased by requiring confirmation of progression with a second scan, as is routinely done when assessing response.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prostate Cancer Clinical Trial End Points: “RECIST”ing a Step BackwardsClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Multi-Institutional Randomized Phase II Trial of the Epothilone B Analog Ixabepilone (BMS-247550) With or Without Estramustine Phosphate in Patients With Progressive Castrate Metastatic Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer Is a Heterogeneous Group of DiseasesCancer Research, 2004
- Clinical experience with intravenous estramustine phosphate, paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with castrate, metastatic prostate adenocarcinomaCancer, 2003
- Effect of Endothelin-A Receptor Blockade With Atrasentan on Tumor Progression in Men With Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Phase II, Placebo-Controlled TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Estimating survival benefit in castrate metastatic prostate cancer: decision making in proceeding to a definitive phase III trialUrology, 2003
- New Guidelines to Evaluate the Response to Treatment in Solid TumorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- Clinical Trials in Relapsed Prostate Cancer: Defining the TargetJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Surrogate End Points in Clinical Trials: Are We Being Misled?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- A test for partial correlation with censored astronomical dataMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1996