The discovery value of “Big Science”
Open Access
- 9 April 2007
- journal article
- Published by Rockefeller University Press in The Journal of Experimental Medicine
- Vol. 204 (4) , 701-704
- https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20070073
Abstract
The increasing complexity of biomedical research is leading to the exploration of new models for large-scale collaborative research. This Big Science approach, however, has created anxieties and potential tensions between investigator-driven research, and research guided by a more organized, collaborative effort. Another potential tension exists between research conducted purely in search of new knowledge and research aimed at finding solutions. We argue that big biomedicine--the work of coordinated multidisciplinary groups that use the latest technologies to solve complex problems--can be an important way to harness the creativity of individual investigators, stimulate innovation, and supply the infrastructure, experimental systems, and resources needed to solve the urgent health problems confronted by our global society. We discuss this using the example of the Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- NIH in the Post-Doubling Era: Realities and StrategiesScience, 2006
- AIDS vaccine research becomes 'big science'Nature, 2006
- HIV/AIDS: Gates Foundation Doubles Support for AIDS Vaccine ResearchScience, 2006
- New Virtual Center Aims to Speed AIDS Vaccine ProgressScience, 2005
- The Problem with Academic Medicine: Engineering Our Way into and out of the MessPLoS Medicine, 2005
- A Shot in the Arm for AIDS Vaccine ResearchPLoS Medicine, 2005
- The 'War on Cancer' and its impactNature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2004
- A Perspective on the War on CancelThe Cancer Journal, 2002
- Objection #3: Impossible to DoScience, 2001
- Collaboration for Accelerating Progress in Medical ResearchScience, 1967