Abstract
Styles of hypnotic communication may be viewed as varying on a continuum from “direct” to “indirect.” These two styles are discussed in terms of their comparative strengths and weaknesses and are evaluated in terms of their relationship to the client's goals, degree of resistance which might be aroused, potential for teaching problem solving skills, and responsibility for therapeutic outcomes. It is concluded that each style has strengths and weaknesses, and the style to be used should vary with individual needs of the client.

This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit: