A Comparative Analysis of Direct and Indirect Hypnotic Communication Styles
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis
- Vol. 25 (4) , 270-276
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.1983.10404114
Abstract
Styles of hypnotic communication may be viewed as varying on a continuum from “direct” to “indirect.” These two styles are discussed in terms of their comparative strengths and weaknesses and are evaluated in terms of their relationship to the client's goals, degree of resistance which might be aroused, potential for teaching problem solving skills, and responsibility for therapeutic outcomes. It is concluded that each style has strengths and weaknesses, and the style to be used should vary with individual needs of the client.This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Matching Primary Representational System Predicates on Hypnotic RelaxationAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1981
- Symptom Prescription Techniques: Clinical Applications Using Elements of CommunicationAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1980
- Hypnosis and the UnhypnotizableAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1980
- An ego-psychological theory of altered states of consciousnessInternational Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 1977
- The Confusion Technique in HypnosisAmerican Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1964
- Strategies of psychotherapy.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1963