Impact of Volume Weighted Mean Nuclear Volume on Outcomes Following Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical Prostatectomy
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 171 (2) , 687-691
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000106864.91375.80
Abstract
Although salvage radiation therapy (RT) is a potentially curative treatment option for men with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP), to our knowledge there are no definitive pretreatment factors predicting patients likely to benefit from this treatment. We examined the impact of volume weighted mean nuclear volume (MNV) of biopsy specimens on disease outcomes and describe its usefulness as a new independent predictor. We analyzed 33 patients who received salvage RT for biochemical failure after RP, including 11 who had received neoadjuvant hormone therapy before RP. Salvage RT was delivered to the prostatic bed at a total dose of 60 Gy with a 4-field contoured technique. Unbiased estimates of MNV were calculated from more than 100 cancer nuclei per patient captured from biopsy specimens based on a stereological method and compared with other clinical and pathological findings, including patient age, pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, biopsy Gleason score, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical Gleason score, pathological stage, tumor volume, surgical margin status, biochemical disease-free duration before RT, nadir PSA and PSA doubling time before RT, and pre-RT PSA with regard to predicting the disease outcome after salvage RT. The median followup after salvage RT was 43.4 months. A total of 17 patients (52%) experienced biochemical failure a median of 6.7 months (range 0 to 48.1) after RT. On univariate analysis MNV and log(pre-RT PSA) were significant predictors of disease outcome in all patients and in the 22 nonneoadjuvant patient subset (p = 0.0124 and 0.0159, respectively). Log(nadir PSA) and PSA doubling time were also significant in the latter subset (p = 0.0287 and 0.0475, respectively). However, dual multivariate analysis revealed that MNV was the only independent predictor in the 2 groups (logistic regression analysis p = 0.00931 and 0.03511, and Cox proportional hazards analysis p = 0.00483 and 0.02277, respectively). There was a statistically significant biochemical disease-free survival advantage for small vs large MNV in each data set (p = 0.0072 and 0.0036, respectively). Our results suggest that an estimate of MNV contributes significantly to the prediction of biochemical control after salvage RT. However, further investigation in a larger nonneoadjuvant population is needed to confirm its significance in combination with other clinical and pathological findings.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prediction of Pathological Stage in Patients with Clinical Stage T1c Prostate Cancer: The New ChallengeJournal of Urology, 2002
- Computer-assisted image analysis–derived intermediate endpointsUrology, 2001
- Volume-weighted mean nuclear volume predicts tumor biology of clinically organ-confined prostate cancerThe Prostate, 2001
- PREDICTING PATHOLOGICAL STAGE OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER USING VOLUME WEIGHTED MEAN NUCLEAR VOLUMEJournal of Urology, 2000
- Quantitative nuclear grade (QNG): A new image analysis-based biomarker of clinically relevant nuclear structure alterationsJournal of Cellular Biochemistry, 2000
- Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical ProstatectomyJAMA, 1999
- Tissue architecture analysis in prostate cancer and its precursors: An innovative approach to computerized histometry.European Urology, 1999
- 5-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1994
- Fundamental stereological formulae based on isotropically orientated probes through fixed points with applications to particle analysisJournal of Microscopy, 1989
- Particle sizes and their distributions estimated from line‐ and point‐sampled intercepts. Including graphical unfoldingJournal of Microscopy, 1983