Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on ‘honest’ female ornamentation
Open Access
- 22 October 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 270 (1529) , 2159-2165
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2482
Abstract
Female ornamentation has long been overlooked because of the greater prevalence of elaborate displays in males. However, the circumstances under which females would benefit from honestly signalling their quality are limited. Females are not expected to invest in ornamentation unless the fitness benefits of the ornament exceed those derived from investing the resources directly into offspring. It has been proposed that when females gain direct benefits from mating, females may instead be selected for ornamentation that deceives males about their reproductive state. In the empidid dance flies, males frequently provide nuptial gifts and it is usually only the female that is ornamented. Female traits in empidids, such as abdominal sacs and enlarged pinnate leg scales, have been proposed to ‘deceive’ males into matings by disguising egg maturity. We quantified sexual selection in the dance fly Rhamphomyia tarsata and found escalating, quadratic selection on pinnate scales and that pinnate scales honestly reflect female fecundity. Mated females had a larger total number and more mature eggs than unmated females, highlighting a potential benefit rather than a cost of male mate choice. We also show correlational selection on female pinnate scales and fecundity. Correlational selection, equivalent investment patterns or increased nutrition from nuptial gifts may all maintain honesty in female ornamentation.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Biological signals as handicapsPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Mate selection—A selection for a handicapPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Significance of primate sexual swellingsNature, 2002
- Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signallingPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2002
- The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studiesBiological Reviews, 1998
- Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competitionProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1996
- Ornaments or offspring: costs to reproductive success restrict sexual selection processesBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1995
- Exploring Fitness SurfacesThe American Naturalist, 1994
- Why do males of the dance flyEmpis borealis refuse to mate? The importance of female age and sizeJournal of Insect Behavior, 1989
- Intra-sexual selection in DrosophilaHeredity, 1948