Canine BFU‐e progenitors: Adaptation of a reproducible assay and anatomical distribution
- 2 January 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The International Journal of Cell Cloning
- Vol. 9 (6) , 579-593
- https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.5530090608
Abstract
In vitro cloning assays are used increasingly in investigative hematotoxi‐cology and in screening candidate compounds for their hematotoxic potential. To expand these applications, a practical cloning assay for erythroid burst‐forming units (BFU‐e) that uses a microplasma clot (MPC) system was adapted to the dog, a species used extensively in experimental hematology and drug development. This system offers the advantage over the methylcellulose and soft agar culture systems of allowing specimen fixation and, therefore, morphological and cytochemical evaluation. The distribution of BFU‐e among various anatomic sites was assessed using the MPC cloning system, which was modified to optimize the BFU‐e growth. BFU‐e growth required only erythropoietin (Epo) in the culture medium and there was no need for an exogenous source of burst‐promoting activity (BPA). The cloning efficiency was linearly proportional to the plating concentrations of Epo and marrow mononuclear cells (MMC) over a range of 0 to 3 U Epo and 1 × 103 to 3 × 103 MMC per ml of culture, respectively. Increases in concentrations of Epo and MMC beyond these levels were not associated with linear growth. The addition of trans‐ferrin and spleen‐conditioned medium containing a mixture of growth factors (including BPA) reduced BFU‐e growth. The relative concentration of BFU‐e was comparable among samples collected from the iliac crest, femur, and humerus. Serial cultures performed on individual dogs were highly reproducible and there was little variation in BFU‐e activity among dogs of comparable age. It was concluded that the MPC system is a practical and reproducible cloning system for early (BFU‐e), as well as late erythroid colony‐forming units (CFU‐e) in the dog. The concentration of BFU‐e appears comparable throughout the active marrow; therefore, various anatomic sites can be used interchangeably for serial quantitative analysis of this progenitor.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative distribution of marrow CFU‐e and CFU‐gm progenitors in different anatomic sites in the dogThe International Journal of Cell Cloning, 1990
- Cephalosporin-induced Changes in the Ultrastructure of Canine Bone MarrowVeterinary Pathology, 1988
- Repopulating potential of canine bone marrow cells: differences between large and small cells separated by velocity sedimentationBritish Journal of Haematology, 1985
- Growth of erythroid colonies in agar cultures of normal human bone marrowAnnals of Hematology, 1985
- CFU-GM Colony-Enhancing Activity in Sera of Dogs under Acute and Chronic Gamma-Irradiation RegimensActa Haematologica, 1984
- Canine as a biomedical research model: immunological, hematological, and oncological aspectsPublished by Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI) ,1980
- Growth in vitro of donor marrow cultured with recipient lymphocytes predicts the fate of marrow grafts in transfused DLA-identical dogsBlood, 1979
- Distribution of Granulopoietic Activity in the Human Skeleton, Studied by Colony Growth in Agar Diffusion ChambersBritish Journal of Haematology, 1976
- A Differential Effect of Hydroxyurea on Hemopoietic Stem Cell Colonies in Vitro and in VivoExperimental Biology and Medicine, 1970
- New Tables for Multiple Comparisons with a ControlPublished by JSTOR ,1964