Postural Stability and Rotational Tests: Their Effectiveness for Screening Dizzy Patients

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Results of independently interpreted computerized stationary platform posturography and white noise rotational tests were compared with diagnoses for 110 patients. Using the criterion that an abnormal result from either test classified the subject as abnormal, the sensitivity estimate for the pair of tests was 78% for persons with diagnoses known to result in vestibular dysfunction. The specificity estimate was 90%. Both a vestibulo-ocular and a vestibulo-spinal test were required for effective screening. Consecutive tests performed over five days showed the rotation test to be much less variable than posturography. Rotation testing is therefore preferred for following the performance of patients having disorders thought to cause fluctuating vestibular systems. Interobserver reliability rates were 83% for posturography and 93% for rotation tests.

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit: