Perceived Severity and Justifiability of a Deviant Act and Their Relationship to Suggested Sanctions
- 1 October 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 51 (3) , 787-791
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.51.3.787
Abstract
Previous research with mock jurors which concerned attribution of responsibility for a deviant/criminal act traditionally varied the “severity” of the act presented to subjects. Yet severity and justifiability of that act are seldom if ever differentiated. These dimensions are, both practically and theoretically, potentially disparate yet past research has neglected the dimension of justifiability. To test this possible distinction defendant's social status, victim's social status, severity of the crime (armed robbery vs petty larceny), and compensation to the victim were systematically varied in written criminal cases presented to 168 male and 228 female student subjects, randomly chosen. Subjects made a distinction between the two dimensions and both were highly associated with the recommended sanctions. These data were taken as evidence that (1) previous research has been remiss in not distinguishing between these two dimensions and (2) Heider's Level 5 of developmental stages of responsibility attribution (justifiability) was given support.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Retaliation Latency and Provocation Level on Judged Blameworthiness for Retaliatory AggressionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1978
- Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Physical Attractiveness and Severity of SentencingPsychological Reports, 1977
- The Effect of Several Types of Pretrial Publicity on the Guilt Attributions of Simulated Jurors1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1973
- Responsibility attribution: Role of outcome severity, situational ambiguity, and internal-external control1Journal of Personality, 1972
- Jury Research in America: Its Past and FutureLaw & Society Review, 1970
- Attribution of Responsibility as a Basis for Sanctioning BehaviourBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1969
- Responsibility attribution, empathy, and punitiveness1Journal of Personality, 1968
- An empirical test of Heider's levels in attribution of responsibility.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964
- The psychology of interpersonal relations.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958