Donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 10 October 2006
- journal article
- guideline
- Published by CMA Impact Inc. in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
- Vol. 175 (8) , S1
- https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.060895
Abstract
These recommendations are the result of a national, multidisciplinary, year-long process to discuss whether and how to proceed with organ donation after cardiocirculatory death (DCD) in Canada. A national forum was held in February 2005 to discuss and develop recommendations on the principles, procedures and practice related to DCD, including ethical and legal considerations. At the forum9s conclusion, a strong majority of participants supported proceeding with DCD programs in Canada. The forum also recognized the need to formulate and emphasize core values to guide the development of programs and protocols based on the medical, ethical and legal framework established at this meeting. Although end-of-life care should routinely include the opportunity to donate organs and tissues, the duty of care toward dying patients and their families remains the dominant priority of health care teams. The complexity and profound implications of death are recognized and should be respected, along with differing personal, ethnocultural and religious perspectives on death and donation. Decisions around withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, management of the dying process and the determination of death by cardiocirculatory criteria should be separate from and independent of donation and transplant processes. The recommendations in this report are intended to guide individual programs, regional health authorities and jurisdictions in the development of DCD protocols. Programs will develop based on local leadership and advance planning that includes education and engagement of stakeholders, mechanisms to assure safety and quality and public information. We recommend that programs begin with controlled DCD within the intensive care unit where (after a consensual decision to withdraw life-sustaining therapy) death is anticipated, but has not yet occurred, and unhurried consent discussions can be held. Uncontrolled donation (where death has occurred after unanticipated cardiac arrest) should only be considered after a controlled DCD program is well established. Although we recommend that programs commence with kidney donation, regional transplant expertise may guide the inclusion of other organs. The impact of DCD, including pre-and post-mortem interventions, on donor family experiences, organ availability, graft function and recipient survival should be carefully documented and studied.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Severe brain injury to neurological determination of death: Canadian forum recommendationsCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Organ donor management in Canada: recommendations of the forum on Medical Management to Optimize Donor Organ PotentialCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Non‐heart beating organ donationInternal Medicine Journal, 2004
- Donation After Cardiac Death: The University of Wisconsin Experience with Renal TransplantationAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2004
- Another Matter of Life and DeathAnesthesiology, 2003
- Recommendations for nonheartbeating organ donationCritical Care Medicine, 2001
- Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: A comparison of teaching and community hospitalsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unitCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 1995
- Nonheartbeating Cadaveric Organ DonationAnnals of Surgery, 1994
- ADVANTAGE OF COLD STORAGE OVER MACHINE PERFUSION FOR PRESERVATION OF CADAVER KIDNEYSTransplantation, 1982