Ridge Analysis 25 Years Later
- 1 August 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The American Statistician
- Vol. 39 (3) , 186-192
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479425
Abstract
The response surface technique called ridge analysis was originally introduced by Hoerl (1959) more than 25 years ago. Despite tremendous advantages over more conventional response surface procedures when more than two independent variables are present, ridge analysis has received little attention in the statistical literature since then, although numerous applications have appeared in engineering journals. This situation may be partially due to the fact that this procedure led to the discovery of ridge regression, which has completely overshadowed ridge analysis in the literature since. This discussion will briefly review the mathematics of ridge analysis, its literature, practical advantages, and relationship to ridge regression.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Simultaneous Optimization of Multiple Responses Represented by Polynomial Regression FunctionsTechnometrics, 1981
- Modified Ridge AnalysisTechnometrics, 1979
- Optimierung der Fischer‐Tropsch‐Flüssigphasen‐Synthese in Richtung der maximalen Selektivität an C2 bis C4‐OlefinenChemie Ingenieur Technik - CIT, 1979
- Response Surface Techniques for Dual Response SystemsTechnometrics, 1973
- Ridge Regression: Applications to Nonorthogonal ProblemsTechnometrics, 1970
- Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal ProblemsTechnometrics, 1970
- “Ridge Analysis” of Response SurfacesTechnometrics, 1963
- On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum ConditionsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1951